Update: IRS Moves Tax Filing Deadline to July 15, 2020 in Light of Coronavirus Pandemic

Update: IRS Moves Tax Filing Deadline to July 15, 2020 in Light of Coronavirus Pandemic

Update: IRS Moves Tax Filing Deadline to July 15, 2020 in Light of Coronavirus Pandemic

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

 Breaking: March 20, 2020

In today’s White House Covid-19 press briefing, it was announced that American taxpayers now have until July 15th to file their taxes without risking late filing penalties.  Taxpayers are still encouraged to file ASAP if they are expecting a refund.

March 17, 2020 Announcement

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin announced today that Americans who owe up to $1 million in taxes can have penalty and interest charges waived by the IRS for up to 90 days, Mnuchin encouraged Americans file their taxes by April 15. There is not yet a clear indication as to whether the IRS will officially extend the April 15th 2020 filing deadline as well.

“If you owe a payment to the IRS, you can defer up to $1 million as an individual — and the reason we are doing $1 million is because that covers pass-throughs and small businesses — and $10 million for corporations, interest-free and penalty-free for 90 days. All you have to do is file your taxes,” said Mnuchin.

Mnuchin went on to say, “We encourage those Americans who can file later taxes to continue to file their taxes because you will get tax refunds and we don’t want you to lose out. Many people do this electronically which is easy for them and the IRS.”

Time for a Consultation

With the recent Stock Market panic and sell off, investors may be prone to making decisions that can have serious consequences to their financial well being and to their tax bill. We’re here to help you wade through the information and disinformation to make informed and careful decisions. Click here to book a consultation online.

Topics we have been discussing with clients include:

  • Tax Loss Harvesting
  • The Wash Sale Rule
  • Dollar Cost Averaging
  • Financial Plan Review
  • Cash Position Review
  • Real Estate Investment Review
  • Preparing your personal finances for a possible recession

Watch this space for breaking tax information as it develops!

 

 

What is a Withholding Agent and Why are They Important?

What is a Withholding Agent and Why are They Important?

What is a Withholding Agent and Why are They Important?

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

The following will describe in detail how the United States (U.S.) tax law also known as the IRC (Internal Revenue Code) or Code defines a withholding agent. I’ll provide information on the definition of a withholding agent, and what role and responsibilities are assigned to them.

How the IRS Defines a Withholding Agent

IRC 1473(4) and 1.1473-1(d), define a withholding agent as any person in whatever capacity having control, receipt, custody, disposal, or payment of any item of income of a foreign person that is subject to withholding. In the eyes of the U.S. federal tax authorities, a person is considered to have custody of, or control over a distribution of funds or income, if a person is the one who ultimately has the authority to release the funds or income.  If such person does not properly withhold the correct amount of tax they will be subject to pay the tax not withheld.

How the IRS Defines a Non-Resident Alien

A non-resident alien (NRA) is a person who is not a U.S. citizen.

A NRA is not a person who has the legal right to permanently reside within the U.S. (a green card holder), and not a person who has resided or been in the U.S. for more than 183 days or an average of 121 days a year for the prior three years. 

These persons are foreigners for U.S. income tax purposes and therefore they are not subject to U.S. income tax unless they derive income from sources within the U.S. such as dividends, rents, royalties, business income or income and gains from real property located within the U.S.  If this is the case, then the person who is deemed to be the withholding agent must ensure that the appropriate tax is withheld and submitted to the U.S. tax authorities.  

In other words, a foreign person who is considered a nonresident under the U.S. tax code is subject to thirty percent tax withholding on U.S source income unless a double tax treaty (e.g., income tax treaty) between the U.S. and the country of residence of the foreign person says otherwise.

Therefore, thee withholding agent is legally liable to withhold tax payments before the distribution. The IRS can demand payment from the agent if the tax was not withheld. 

 When a foreign person tries to open a bank or investment account, and the foreign financial institution (FFI) and U.S. financial institutions see that the foreign person might have a U.S. connection of almost any kind, (even a U.S. care-of address will be sufficient) they will  request the foreign person complete and submit U.S. forms W-8BEN-E, W-8ECI, W-8IMY, W-8EXP. If the financial institution does request or attain the form submissions, the U.S. tax authorities (and sometimes the U.S. Department of Justice) can impose penalties or decline a FFI’s ability to use the U.S. financial markets. They can also choose to prosecute the institution for violation of U.S. law. 

Depending on the relationship of the investor and investment, the financial institution itself may be considered the withholding agent and therefore subject to ensuring proper U.S. tax withholding.  The aforementioned W8 forms will be an indication for the foreign financial institution what tax, if any should be withheld from the account holder and if the FATCA rules (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) may apply to the account holder. (See our FATCA blogpost here.)

Since the enactment of FATCA, most foreign and U.S. financial institutions follow procedural due diligence and ongoing monitoring when opening accounts for U.S. and foreign persons. The withholding agent monitors income from U.S.-sourced interest, dividends, rents, royalties, services, or wages. They calculate the tax is required to be withheld and ensure and that the appropriate amount is withheld to avoid penalties or more severe action.  

In addition, to withholding the appropriate tax, withholding agents are required to file a Form 1042 (Annual Withholding Tax Return for U.S. Source Income of Foreign Person) and submit the tax to the U.S. taxing authorities. Note: If there is a failure to provide correct statements to recipients and reasonable cause cannot be shown, a penalty of up to $260 may be imposed for each failure to furnish Form 1042-S when due.  A penalty may also be imposed for failure to include all required information or for furnishing incorrect information on Form 1042-S. The maximum penalty is $3,218,500 for all failures to furnish correct recipient statements during a calendar year. 

Special rules apply for withholding agents in determining whether a flow-through entity (trust estate, or partnership) must treat a payment of U.S. source FDAP income to the to the beneficiaries or partners as taxable. In the case of partnerships, simple trusts, complex trusts, and estates, rules similar to the rules that apply when determining withholding under IRS rules Chapter 3 (income tax withholding) apply. 

There are many exceptions that apply in the calculation of withholding payments to the IRS. The requirements are very complex and should be discussed with your tax advisers. IWTA is more than happy to assist with your international tax consulting and computation needs. Click here to contact us.

FACTA Filing: What U.S. Citizens Need to Know About Foreign Asset Reporting

FACTA Filing: What U.S. Citizens Need to Know About Foreign Asset Reporting

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Tax Act (FATCA) became law in 2010 and is a major development in the taxation of Americans living abroad. FATCA is a tax law that requires U.S. citizens at home and outside of the United States (U.S.) to file annual reports on any foreign account holdings. FATCA is intended to prevent tax evasion by U.S. citizens and residents via the use of offshore accounts. The FATCA rules run parallel to the withholding rules applicable to any fixed, determinable, annual or periodical (FDAP) income of a nonresident alien or foreign corporation received from U.S. sources.

Certain U.S. taxpayers holding financial assets outside the United States must report those assets to the IRS on Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets. In addition to that, the U.S. person is required to report foreign financial accounts on FinCEN Form 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR). 

FATCA also requires certain foreign financial institutions to report directly to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  Banks and other foreign financial institutions must report information about financial accounts held by U.S. taxpayers or by foreign entities in which U.S. taxpayers hold a 10{105615a82985984cf1704e8776ec685e1345b73ddec43811fd3f038097961455} or greater interest (defined as a substantial ownership interest). 

FFIs and NFFEs

To comply with FATCA, all entities need to be evaluated to determine whether they fall under the definitions of Foreign Financial Institution (FFI) and Non-Foreign Financial Entity (NFFE). 

FFIs are financial institutions that are foreign entities which are not defined as a U.S. person pursuant to U.S. tax law (U.S. Code Title 26, aka as the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)).

 NFFEs are foreign entities that are not financial institutions, including territory entities. FATCA mandates that FFIs participate in the information-sharing network or face a 30 percent withholding tax on U.S.-source investment income (theirs or their client’s investment account income).

Thus, FATCA withholding will be imposed on any withholdable payments made to an FFI, unless they abide by the IRC and related U.S. Treasury Regulations or an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the U.S. and the FFIs country of residence.  Therefore, if you set up a new account with a foreign financial institution, they will ask you for information regarding your U.S. tax residence and for proof of U.S. tax filing compliance.

Reporting thresholds vary based on whether you file a joint income tax return or live abroad. If you are single or file separately from your spouse, you must submit a Form 8938 if you have more than $200,000 of specified foreign financial assets at the end of the year and you live abroad; or more than $50,000, if you live in the United States, If you file jointly with your spouse, these thresholds double. 

Who Needs to File FBAR? 

Exceptions to the reporting requirement that include: 

  • A financial account maintained by a U.S. payor. A U.S. payor includes a U.S. branch of a foreign financial institution, a foreign branch of a U.S. financial institution, and certain foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations. Therefore, financial accounts with such entities do not have to be reported. 
  • At the time of filing the required income tax return, the taxpayer was not aware that he or she had a beneficial interest in a foreign trust or a foreign estate. 

With some exceptions, if specified foreign financial assets were reported on other forms then they are not required to be reported a  second time on Form 8938. These include  any of the following:

    • Transactions with foreign trusts and foreign gifts reported on Form 3520 or Form 3520-A (filed by the trust). Form 3520 A instructions
    • Activity of a Controlled Foreign Corporation reported on Form 5471
    • Transactions with Passive Foreign Investment Companies (PFIC) reported on Form 8621.  With some exceptions, a PFIC is generally a foreign investment / hedge fund. 
    • Activity of a Foreign Controlled Partnership(s) reported on Form 8865
    • Transactions with a Registered Canadian retirement savings plans reported on Form 8891

Form 8938 Penalty

Non-compliance or late filing of Form 8938 is subject to a penalty of $10,000  and an additional penalty of up to $50,000 for continued failure to file after IRS notification, and a 40 percent penalty on the amount of any understated tax  attributable to non-disclosed of foreign financial assets.

The statute of limitations is extended up to six years after the filing of an income tax return .  There is no statute of limitations if the FACTA Form 8938 is not filed.  

If you make a showing that any failure to disclose is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, no penalty will be imposed for failure to file Form 8938. Reasonable cause is determined on a case-by-case basis, considering all relevant facts and circumstances.  It should be noted that the IRS will not accept as reasonable cause that the tax professional who prepared the U.S. income tax return for the person had no knowledge or a lack of understanding of the U.S. tax law if such professional is not a U.S. professional.  For example, if it is claimed as reasonable cause that a Canadian tax professional or tax professional from the United Kingdom who prepared a U.S. income tax return was not aware or knowledgeable of  the U.S. international tax rules, such reasonable cause is generally not accepted by the IRS.     

Please consult your tax advisers. IWTA is more than happy to assist you with any international tax planning and compliance.

OECD Leads Multinational Coalition to Address Digital Economy Tax Laws

OECD Leads Multinational Coalition to Address Digital Economy Tax Laws

OECD Leads Multinational Coalition to Address Digital Economy Tax Laws

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

Latest Posts

Find Previous Posts

International Tax experts view digital tax as one of the “hotbutton” issues of the new decade.

The exponential international growth of the digital economy has erased retail and wholesale borders, had carved new roots and frameworks into the supply chain, and not surprisingly, has upended the way the traditional ways and means of tax collection.

How do countries collect taxes from buyers across continents? Is there a uniform, unilateral method to comply with each country’s tax code, or is it possible to create international tax rules for the collection of sales and use taxes on digital platforms?

To that end, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has gathered over 134 countries and jurisdictions to tackle this important issue. The OECD is an international policy-building body whose goal is to establish international norms and find evidence-based solutions to a range of social, economic and environmental challenges.

“We’re making real progress to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation of the economy, and to continue advancing toward a consensus-based solution to overhaul the rules-based international tax system by 2020,” said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría.

“This plan brings together common elements of existing competing proposals, involving over 130 countries, with input from governments, business, civil society, academia and the general public. It brings us closer to our ultimate goal: ensuring all MNEs pay their fair share.”

”Failure to reach agreement by 2020 would greatly increase the risk that countries will act unilaterally, with negative consequences on an already fragile global economy. We must not allow that to happen,” says Gurría.

IWTA will keep clients apprised of the progress and success of implementation of a unilateral agreement on a digital tax code. Clients with businesses that sell online to customers outside of their own countries will face new cross border tax issues. Even solopreneurs can be affected if they sell goods or services online to international clientele.

Click here to read the full press release from OECD.  

GILTI Tax and Controlled Foreign Corporations

GILTI Tax and Controlled Foreign Corporations

GILTI Tax and Controlled Foreign Corporations

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

Find Previous Posts

Lasts Posts

When making a financial decision, it is important to consider tax consequences and any additional tax filing requirements.

Previously before the tax reform act of 2017, to maximize earnings, offshore operations could be used to accumulate earnings. The logic at that time was to create a blocker corporation with regard to foreign operating businesses doing business in foreign jurisdictions.  The accumulated earnings would not be subject to U.S. tax until the corporation made distributions  in the form of dividends.

Internal Revenue Code IRC Section 965 was enacted as part of the new Tax Reform Act (TCJA).  This new law imposes a one-time transition tax (toll charge) on the undistributed, non-previously taxed post-1986 foreign earnings and profits of certain U.S.-owned foreign corporations. IRC Section 965 is seen as part of the transition to what some believe to be a move in the direction of a territorial tax regime.

In general, U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations may elect to pay the toll charge in installments over eight years. Also, in addition to that, U.S. persons may be subject to an additional category of Controlled Foreign Corporation Income, Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) for tax years 2018 and forward. GILTI tax was enacted under the TCJA (new IRC 951A). Taxpayers subject to GILTI tax should include the Form 8992 in their tax return.

GILTI Tax- Individuals

Persons will be subject to GILTI regulations if they are a U.S. shareholder of a Controlled Foreign Corporation. U.S. persons (citizens, residents, substantial presence or green card holders, domestic entities) are treated as a U.S. Shareholder of a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) if such persons own at least 10 percent directly or indirectly of a foreign corporation’s voting stock or value. CFC is any foreign corporation of which more than 50 percent of the vote or value of the stock is owned by U.S. shareholders on any day during a given year.

Basically, U.S. shareholders of one or more CFCs must take into account its pro-rata share of the tested income or tested loss of the CFC(s) in determining the U.S. shareholder’s GILTI tax calculations. It is important to note that other tax forms reflect information for Form 8992 and Section 965 tax withholding.

Generally speaking, when taxpayers meet the requirements to file Form 5471, (Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations) as a category four and five, the filing should include Schedule I-1, Information for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income. Information from Form 5471 Schedule I-1 and Schedule C will be reflected on Form 8992 to complete the GILTI tax calculation.

Considering the fact that the GILTI regulations are more favorable to the corporation, the taxpayer could make an  IRC Section 962 election which allows an individual who is a U.S. Shareholder of a Controlled Foreign Corporation to elect to be treated  as a domestic corporation (U.S. corporation) for the purpose of computing their income tax liability on their pro-rata share of the CFC’s subpart F income.

Significant tax savings opportunities for  U.S. domestic corporations could be achieved by filling Form 8993, section 250 for Foreign- Derived Intangible Income (FDII) and GILTI tax. If the corporation has paid or accrued foreign tax in the country it operates, the taxpayer should include that amount on Form 1118, Foreign Tax Credit under section 951.

If the taxpayer does not have voting power and never wanted to participate in CFC management, one of the options to avoid the complexity of GILTI tax is to form a foreign trust and place the CFC stock(s) under the ownership of said foreign trust. Doing this  eliminates GILTI tax calculation and reporting.

The downside is that the taxpayer will need to consider the potential gift tax implications and reporting at the time of the transfer of ownership. What’s more, they may be required to calculate Distributable Net Income (DNI) which gets reported on Form 3520 and potentially Form 3520-A. There will be additional tax filing fees, but this strategy will eliminate the complexity of GILTI tax calculations and reporting.

The IRS has issued some guidance related to this topic, and there are still uncertainties existing on how to treat certain items. The international tax provisions are highly complex and will likely continue to increase the tax compliance complexity for even the most straightforward corporations with foreign operations and their shareholders.

A tax professional with international tax expertise should be sought in these matters.  If you need  assistance, please contact IWTA.

China Tightens Tax Evasion Rules Amid Increased CRS Enforcement

China Tightens Tax Evasion Rules Amid Increased CRS Enforcement

China Tightens Tax Evasion Rules Amid Increased CRS Enforcement

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

As Beijing increases its efforts to prevent tax evasion, wealthy Chinese are facing a variety of new tax rules both at home and abroad. The increased focus on reporting comes as the country experiences a boom in wealth, with some experts reporting that personal wealth in China skyrocketed to $24 trillion and $1 trillion of that is held outside the country.

Increased global cooperation through the CRS
At the forefront of worldwide anti-tax evasion efforts is the introduction of a global financial disclosure system – the Common Reporting Standard, or CRS – through which participating jurisdictions automatically share annual reports detailing reportable accounts, their balances, and their beneficiaries. For example, if a Chinese tax resident opens a bank account in the U.K., the CRS requires British authorities to send the information to Beijing as part of their report, and vice versa.

The CRS casts a broad net, with any entity or individual who’s a resident of a CRS signatory state being considered a reportable person (although real estate is an excluded asset). The process has become so common that even several tax-favorable jurisdictions have agreed to sign up for CRS. Last year, China started sharing information with approximately 100 participating jurisdictions.

However, there are holdouts – most of which are unsuitable as tax havens due to political, economic or social instability. Another notable exception is the U.S., as the country chose to maintain its own framework, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), through 113 bilateral agreements.

Domestic regulations tightened following the CRS
In addition to participating in the CRS framework, China is continuing its efforts to close loopholes in the system. Previously, wealthy Chinese citizens were not required to pay taxes on overseas earnings by acquiring a foreign passport or green card while maintaining Chinese citizenship. However, China recently began taxing global income from all holders of “hukou” household registrations, regardless of whether they may be citizens elsewhere.
Additionally, the government has implemented the “Golden Tax System Phase III,” a new data platform that gives it a more complete picture of a taxpayer’s finances. The government is hoping to stem the loss of tax revenue through means such as underground banks that facilitate illegal foreign exchange transactions. Uncertainty over those new rules has led certain Chinese taxpayers to create overseas trusts. For example, in late 2018, four Chinese tycoons transferred more than $17 billion into family trusts with ownership structures involving entities solely in the British Virgin Islands.

Participation in CRS, changes to the “hukou” system, and the implementation of the Golden Tax System together signal the Chinese government is tightening its anti-tax evasion legislation and enforcement. Chinese taxpayers with investments or property overseas should be aware of the new disclosure requirements and seek professional advice.

FAQ: IWTA’s Founder Jack Brister Answers “The Four Questions”

FAQ: IWTA’s Founder Jack Brister Answers “The Four Questions”

jon tyson hhq1Lxtuwd8 unsplash

International Wealth Tax Advisors’ (IWTA) clients come from every corner of the world. Despite differences in language, home governments, profession and cultural norms, there are four questions we get asked over and over. These questions revolve around the general principles and philosophies that have informed U.S. laws and tax laws, defined citizenship and set the stage for the world’s greatest free economy. If you have found our website, chances are that you too are seeking answers to the “Four Questions”.

To that end, IWTA’s founder Jack Brister has written four blog posts addressing the Four Questions, which are:

Q1:  How is it that when the U.S. financial markets crash, and the U.S. economy tanks, Americans never give up?  They get up, brush themselves off and move forward looking for the next opportunity.

Q2:  Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation and not a territorial system like the rest of the world?

Q3:  Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

Q4:  Why does the U.S. tax system require so much disclosure?  What is the cost for failure to Disclose?

We hope you will find IWTA’s blog posts on the Four Questions helpful, and look forward to your comments.

–The IWTA Blog Team

The Four Questions Q3: Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

The Four Questions Q3: Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

The Four Questions Q3: Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

The overarching concept of the U.S. tax system is to tax the economic substance of a transaction or series of transactions.

The principle of substance-over-form is the cornerstone of the U.S. tax system and can be a lethal weapon in the U.S. tax authority’s arsenal.  This doctrine allows the tax authorities to ignore the legal form of an arrangement and to look at the substance of the transaction(s) in order to prevent artificial structures from being used for tax avoidance purposes.

It is likely the origins of the U.S. tax system employing substance-over-form rather than form-over-substance is derived from the U.S. legal system and its basic principles of taxation.

The U.S. legal system is a common law system which is one of two primary legal systems in the world: common law and civil law.

The U.S. common law system has its origins from the English courts of equity for which the primary purpose was to provide appropriate remedies to complaints based on equitable principles taken from various sources.   These principles were then used to employ the concept of judicial precedent.  Hence, substance-based rulings.

Civil law on the other hand is believed to originate from the code of laws compiled by the Roman Empire under the rule of Emperor Justinian.  These rules are more rigid because judgements are primarily reliant on the written statutes whereas the common law system is heavily based on principles of equity.

The basic principles of the U.S. federal income tax system encompass the basic principles of taxation: efficiency, certainty and simplicity, flexibility, effectiveness and fairness, neutrality and citizenship which have been further developed through the basic principles of U.S. common law or judicial precedent.

The principal of efficiency states a system of taxation be organized and cost-effective.

The principle of certainty and simplicity state the tax laws be easily understood even without a background in law or accounting; and the principle of flexibility provides that the law can change to meet the government’s need for revenue.   Unfortunately, there are many that would say that the U.S. system does not employee the principle of simplicity but certainly applies the principle of flexibility.  The original tax code enacted in 1913 that met the U.S. constitutional standards was 800 pages.  Currently it is over 10,000 pages. This is partly because the Internal Revenue Code (United States Code, Title 26) changes the law as needed by exceptions to the general rule, and exceptions to the exceptions when the law requires changes (i.e., flexibility).

The principle of effectiveness and fairness requires consequences for not paying the tax due.  In addition, the system is a progressive system and therefore requires those who can pay more will pay the majority of the bill.  In some recent statistics 97{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the total U.S. income taxes is paid by the upper 50{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the income earners.  Of this group the top 1{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} pay 37{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the income tax collected, the next group (2{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} to 5{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5}) of the top income earners pay 20{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the total income taxes collected.  So, the top 5{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} income earners pay almost 60{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the total income taxes collected.  This means the top 5{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the income earners pay the majority of the U.S. income taxes.

 The U.S. principle of neutrality entails that the tax laws apply to all individuals and businesses equally and should not affect the person’s spending decisions (i.e., not hinder overall economic flow / decisions).

 The principle of taxation by citizenship provides that a U.S. person (including U.S. entities, trusts and estates) is taxed as a result of being a citizen or having permanent resident status regardless if they live in the U.S. or abroad.  It is a system of taxing a person’s worldwide income, the income from wherever derived.  Of all the industrialized countries, the U.S. system is the only system of income taxation that is based on the citizenship.  Under U.S. tax law a person includes U.S. entities, trusts and estates because they have separate legal and fiscal personalities; and an individual person with permanent resident status is treated as a citizen for U.S. tax purposes.

Hence, by encompassing the principles of taxation into one simple doctrine, substance-over-form, the U.S. courts have guaranteed the taxation of worldwide economic substance (a common law principle of equity) and minimized tax evasion and avoidance with the use of domestic and international structures by U.S. persons.

OECD Leads Multinational Coalition to Address Digital Economy Tax Laws

The Four Questions: Q2: Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation?

The Four Questions: Q2: Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation?

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

A Citizenship-Based Income Tax

 

The United States (U.S.) system of federal income taxation is a citizenship-based income tax.  Elsewhere in the world, the basic rule is that taxes are based on residency and not on taxation of worldwide income based on citizenship.

The origin of the U.S. taxation of worldwide income is the first federal U.S. income tax. Enacted in 1861 in the early months of the American Civil War, it was part of the Revenue Act of 1861. It levied a 3% tax on incomes over $800, but a 5% tax on income earned in the U.S. by, “any citizen of the United States residing abroad”.

The purpose was to prevent the U.S. wealthy from evading their tax obligations (military and civic) as American citizens and retaining the privileges of citizenship by fleeing the U.S. in its time of crisis. In 1864, the tax was expanded to include income from all sources, no matter where generated (i.e., worldwide taxation).  Scholars have said this was born from the proud sense of being a citizen of the U.S. With all the opportunities and privileges come obligations.  The concept first flowered out of the battlefields of the U.S. civil war. Hence, the defense of citizenship-based taxation and taxation of worldwide income rests on the belief that U.S. citizenship confers benefits independently of where a citizen resides.

It is not necessary that the amount of benefit received be reflected precisely in the amount of tax charged because the system of U.S. taxation is based on taxes benefiting society at large.  Therefore, the income tax liability is measured by the ability to pay, not by the amount of services used during the tax year. But benefit is an important consideration in the scope of an income tax. Many overseas taxpayers feel that taxing the income of citizens living abroad is justifiable only if significant benefits and privileges are afforded U.S. citizens wherever they live.  The primary privilege is the ability to have a voice: “taxation with representation.” The early U.S. colonists did not have representation with the King of England. This issue was the primary cause of the U.S. revolutionary war.

The model of citizenship-based taxation of worldwide income has remained in the U.S. law ever since, even as the rest of the world has gravitated to a different model known as territorial taxation.  Territorial taxation simply considers where the taxpayer is residing.  Over the years, there have been no serious attempts by U.S. lawmakers to end the taxation of citizens who do not reside in the U.S. Instead, the focus of the debate has generally been on the extent to which the earnings of Americans working overseas should be taxed – by both the country of work/residency and the United States.

In addition, some U.S. economists have suggested that the current system of U.S. income taxation was visionary in the sense that the U.S. Federal Government at the time considered the implications of Imperialism.  It has been discussed that shortly after the enactment of the current system in 1913, (allowed by the passage of the 16th  Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which no longer required apportionment among the states under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution), Congress also enacted the foreign tax credit and other measures to make it easy for U.S. persons to know what their worldwide tax obligation would be and encourage overseas investment.  The intention being to spread the American way of capitalism.

So, the thought of the U.S. system of worldwide federal income taxation appears to be rooted in the privilege of citizenship regardless of residence and Imperialism.

See our page on Pre-Immigration and Expatriation Planning for more information on tax liabilities for U.S. citizens living abroad or foreign nationals choosing to reside in the U.S.A.