China Tightens Tax Evasion Rules Amid Increased CRS Enforcement

China Tightens Tax Evasion Rules Amid Increased CRS Enforcement

China Tightens Tax Evasion Rules Amid Increased CRS Enforcement

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

As Beijing increases its efforts to prevent tax evasion, wealthy Chinese are facing a variety of new tax rules both at home and abroad. The increased focus on reporting comes as the country experiences a boom in wealth, with some experts reporting that personal wealth in China skyrocketed to $24 trillion and $1 trillion of that is held outside the country.

Increased global cooperation through the CRS
At the forefront of worldwide anti-tax evasion efforts is the introduction of a global financial disclosure system – the Common Reporting Standard, or CRS – through which participating jurisdictions automatically share annual reports detailing reportable accounts, their balances, and their beneficiaries. For example, if a Chinese tax resident opens a bank account in the U.K., the CRS requires British authorities to send the information to Beijing as part of their report, and vice versa.

The CRS casts a broad net, with any entity or individual who’s a resident of a CRS signatory state being considered a reportable person (although real estate is an excluded asset). The process has become so common that even several tax-favorable jurisdictions have agreed to sign up for CRS. Last year, China started sharing information with approximately 100 participating jurisdictions.

However, there are holdouts – most of which are unsuitable as tax havens due to political, economic or social instability. Another notable exception is the U.S., as the country chose to maintain its own framework, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), through 113 bilateral agreements.

Domestic regulations tightened following the CRS
In addition to participating in the CRS framework, China is continuing its efforts to close loopholes in the system. Previously, wealthy Chinese citizens were not required to pay taxes on overseas earnings by acquiring a foreign passport or green card while maintaining Chinese citizenship. However, China recently began taxing global income from all holders of “hukou” household registrations, regardless of whether they may be citizens elsewhere.
Additionally, the government has implemented the “Golden Tax System Phase III,” a new data platform that gives it a more complete picture of a taxpayer’s finances. The government is hoping to stem the loss of tax revenue through means such as underground banks that facilitate illegal foreign exchange transactions. Uncertainty over those new rules has led certain Chinese taxpayers to create overseas trusts. For example, in late 2018, four Chinese tycoons transferred more than $17 billion into family trusts with ownership structures involving entities solely in the British Virgin Islands.

Participation in CRS, changes to the “hukou” system, and the implementation of the Golden Tax System together signal the Chinese government is tightening its anti-tax evasion legislation and enforcement. Chinese taxpayers with investments or property overseas should be aware of the new disclosure requirements and seek professional advice.

FAQ: IWTA’s Founder Jack Brister Answers “The Four Questions”

FAQ: IWTA’s Founder Jack Brister Answers “The Four Questions”

jon tyson hhq1Lxtuwd8 unsplash

International Wealth Tax Advisors’ (IWTA) clients come from every corner of the world. Despite differences in language, home governments, profession and cultural norms, there are four questions we get asked over and over. These questions revolve around the general principles and philosophies that have informed U.S. laws and tax laws, defined citizenship and set the stage for the world’s greatest free economy. If you have found our website, chances are that you too are seeking answers to the “Four Questions”.

To that end, IWTA’s founder Jack Brister has written four blog posts addressing the Four Questions, which are:

Q1:  How is it that when the U.S. financial markets crash, and the U.S. economy tanks, Americans never give up?  They get up, brush themselves off and move forward looking for the next opportunity.

Q2:  Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation and not a territorial system like the rest of the world?

Q3:  Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

Q4:  Why does the U.S. tax system require so much disclosure?  What is the cost for failure to Disclose?

We hope you will find IWTA’s blog posts on the Four Questions helpful, and look forward to your comments.

–The IWTA Blog Team

The Four Questions Q3: Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

The Four Questions Q3: Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

The Four Questions Q3: Why does the U.S. employ a “substance over form” tax system?

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

The overarching concept of the U.S. tax system is to tax the economic substance of a transaction or series of transactions.

The principle of substance-over-form is the cornerstone of the U.S. tax system and can be a lethal weapon in the U.S. tax authority’s arsenal.  This doctrine allows the tax authorities to ignore the legal form of an arrangement and to look at the substance of the transaction(s) in order to prevent artificial structures from being used for tax avoidance purposes.

It is likely the origins of the U.S. tax system employing substance-over-form rather than form-over-substance is derived from the U.S. legal system and its basic principles of taxation.

The U.S. legal system is a common law system which is one of two primary legal systems in the world: common law and civil law.

The U.S. common law system has its origins from the English courts of equity for which the primary purpose was to provide appropriate remedies to complaints based on equitable principles taken from various sources.   These principles were then used to employ the concept of judicial precedent.  Hence, substance-based rulings.

Civil law on the other hand is believed to originate from the code of laws compiled by the Roman Empire under the rule of Emperor Justinian.  These rules are more rigid because judgements are primarily reliant on the written statutes whereas the common law system is heavily based on principles of equity.

The basic principles of the U.S. federal income tax system encompass the basic principles of taxation: efficiency, certainty and simplicity, flexibility, effectiveness and fairness, neutrality and citizenship which have been further developed through the basic principles of U.S. common law or judicial precedent.

The principal of efficiency states a system of taxation be organized and cost-effective.

The principle of certainty and simplicity state the tax laws be easily understood even without a background in law or accounting; and the principle of flexibility provides that the law can change to meet the government’s need for revenue.   Unfortunately, there are many that would say that the U.S. system does not employee the principle of simplicity but certainly applies the principle of flexibility.  The original tax code enacted in 1913 that met the U.S. constitutional standards was 800 pages.  Currently it is over 10,000 pages. This is partly because the Internal Revenue Code (United States Code, Title 26) changes the law as needed by exceptions to the general rule, and exceptions to the exceptions when the law requires changes (i.e., flexibility).

The principle of effectiveness and fairness requires consequences for not paying the tax due.  In addition, the system is a progressive system and therefore requires those who can pay more will pay the majority of the bill.  In some recent statistics 97{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the total U.S. income taxes is paid by the upper 50{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the income earners.  Of this group the top 1{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} pay 37{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the income tax collected, the next group (2{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} to 5{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5}) of the top income earners pay 20{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the total income taxes collected.  So, the top 5{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} income earners pay almost 60{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the total income taxes collected.  This means the top 5{24b144b2367bbb07d5d4fda493087790376b70e35be933d1efb47b5fb6de27b5} of the income earners pay the majority of the U.S. income taxes.

 The U.S. principle of neutrality entails that the tax laws apply to all individuals and businesses equally and should not affect the person’s spending decisions (i.e., not hinder overall economic flow / decisions).

 The principle of taxation by citizenship provides that a U.S. person (including U.S. entities, trusts and estates) is taxed as a result of being a citizen or having permanent resident status regardless if they live in the U.S. or abroad.  It is a system of taxing a person’s worldwide income, the income from wherever derived.  Of all the industrialized countries, the U.S. system is the only system of income taxation that is based on the citizenship.  Under U.S. tax law a person includes U.S. entities, trusts and estates because they have separate legal and fiscal personalities; and an individual person with permanent resident status is treated as a citizen for U.S. tax purposes.

Hence, by encompassing the principles of taxation into one simple doctrine, substance-over-form, the U.S. courts have guaranteed the taxation of worldwide economic substance (a common law principle of equity) and minimized tax evasion and avoidance with the use of domestic and international structures by U.S. persons.

The Four Questions: Q2: Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation?

The Four Questions: Q2: Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation?

The Four Questions: Q2: Why does the U.S. employ a system of worldwide taxation?

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

A Citizenship-Based Income Tax

 

The United States (U.S.) system of federal income taxation is a citizenship-based income tax.  Elsewhere in the world, the basic rule is that taxes are based on residency and not on taxation of worldwide income based on citizenship.

The origin of the U.S. taxation of worldwide income is the first federal U.S. income tax. Enacted in 1861 in the early months of the American Civil War, it was part of the Revenue Act of 1861. It levied a 3% tax on incomes over $800, but a 5% tax on income earned in the U.S. by, “any citizen of the United States residing abroad”.

The purpose was to prevent the U.S. wealthy from evading their tax obligations (military and civic) as American citizens and retaining the privileges of citizenship by fleeing the U.S. in its time of crisis. In 1864, the tax was expanded to include income from all sources, no matter where generated (i.e., worldwide taxation).  Scholars have said this was born from the proud sense of being a citizen of the U.S. With all the opportunities and privileges come obligations.  The concept first flowered out of the battlefields of the U.S. civil war. Hence, the defense of citizenship-based taxation and taxation of worldwide income rests on the belief that U.S. citizenship confers benefits independently of where a citizen resides.

It is not necessary that the amount of benefit received be reflected precisely in the amount of tax charged because the system of U.S. taxation is based on taxes benefiting society at large.  Therefore, the income tax liability is measured by the ability to pay, not by the amount of services used during the tax year. But benefit is an important consideration in the scope of an income tax. Many overseas taxpayers feel that taxing the income of citizens living abroad is justifiable only if significant benefits and privileges are afforded U.S. citizens wherever they live.  The primary privilege is the ability to have a voice: “taxation with representation.” The early U.S. colonists did not have representation with the King of England. This issue was the primary cause of the U.S. revolutionary war.

The model of citizenship-based taxation of worldwide income has remained in the U.S. law ever since, even as the rest of the world has gravitated to a different model known as territorial taxation.  Territorial taxation simply considers where the taxpayer is residing.  Over the years, there have been no serious attempts by U.S. lawmakers to end the taxation of citizens who do not reside in the U.S. Instead, the focus of the debate has generally been on the extent to which the earnings of Americans working overseas should be taxed – by both the country of work/residency and the United States.

In addition, some U.S. economists have suggested that the current system of U.S. income taxation was visionary in the sense that the U.S. Federal Government at the time considered the implications of Imperialism.  It has been discussed that shortly after the enactment of the current system in 1913, (allowed by the passage of the 16th  Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which no longer required apportionment among the states under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution), Congress also enacted the foreign tax credit and other measures to make it easy for U.S. persons to know what their worldwide tax obligation would be and encourage overseas investment.  The intention being to spread the American way of capitalism.

So, the thought of the U.S. system of worldwide federal income taxation appears to be rooted in the privilege of citizenship regardless of residence and Imperialism.

See our page on Pre-Immigration and Expatriation Planning for more information on tax liabilities for U.S. citizens living abroad or foreign nationals choosing to reside in the U.S.A.

 

The Four Questions Q1: What causes Americans to never give up even when the market crashes?

The Four Questions Q1: What causes Americans to never give up even when the market crashes?

The Four Questions Q1: What causes Americans to never give up even when the market crashes?

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

As a whole, Americans are risk takers

From the early days of the United States (U.S.) colonies the settlers came from various places within Europe.  And they came for various reasons: to increase wealth, broaden influence over world affairs, freedom of religion, and hope for a better life. They came with very little and risked everything for the chance of prosperity.  The trip was long and hard and there was no turning back.  Hence, the early colonists were risk takers and, that culture was the catalyst for the American Revolution.

I recall reading something in George Washington’s (the Commanding General of the Continental Army and first U.S. President) memoirs that said something to the affect that when accepting the commanding role of the Continental Army from the Continental Congress (speaking to the Congress), “You understand that the likelihood of us winning this war with a bunch of militia (mostly farmers) is unlikely, and when we lose, the King will cut our heads off and stake them at the gates for everyone to see so they understand never again to defy the King”.   As you can see Americans have been taking risk for as long as the U.S. has existed, and that mindset continues today. 

Everything about the U.S. encourages risk.

 The bankruptcy laws allow a fresh start almost as many times as one can think.  The U.S. tax rules encourage risk by providing for tax breaks by allowing losses to reduce a person’s tax liability.  Children are taught at an early age to not fear failure, and if you want something you have to work hard and go after it.  We Americans have a saying, “You are only a failure if you don’t try”.  There was once an article in a New York business publication that had statistics reflecting that most successful business people failed seven times before finding success.  Some of the most famous Americans contribute their failures to their success: Michael Jordan, Robert De Niro, and many others.  They will tell you their failures taught them what not to do and what to do the next time. 

The U.S. financial system also encourages risk.  The greater the risk the greater the reward.   Hence, the U.S. is a culture of risk. But that does not stop Americans from looking at what failed, and from those failures what did not work and what did work.  This attitude of learning from mistakes and them moving forward is what helps the U.S. economy get back on track after a market crash and recover quickly from a bad economy. Americans never give up. They brush off the dust of failure and move forward looking for the next opportunity and how to exploit it.  It’s called capitalism. 

 Capitalism is the American Way

Capitalism is what provides freedom, prosperity and hope for a better life.  Capitalism has been the American way and culture from its earliest beginnings.     

A Group You Should Hope to Never Meet: The J5

A Group You Should Hope to Never Meet: The J5

A Group You Should Hope to Never Meet: The J5

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

 Did you know that a new group of international tax compliance superheroes, the Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement, was formed in 2018?

Created to fight international tax crime and money laundering, the group of regulators is known as the J5 and is comprised of five member-countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and the Netherlands.

According to Accounting Today, J5’s first operation took place this week. The group swooped in on a Central American financial institution suspected of money laundering and worldwide tax evasion.

“This … should degrade the confidence of anyone who was considering an offshore location as a way to evade tax or launder the proceeds of crime,” said Australian Tax Office deputy commissioner and Australia’s J5 chief Will Day. “Never before have criminals been at such risk of being detected.”

For the latest information on international tax law and global tax regulations, subscribe to our newsletter and read the IWTA blog. 

 

IRS Turns Eye Toward Cryptocurrency Taxpayers

cyptocurrency digital coin trading exchange market concept scaled

IRS Turns Eye Toward Cryptocurrency Taxpayers

As the use of cryptocurrency becomes increasingly common, regulation is quickly catching up. Over the last 18 months, the SEC has introduced clarity to the securities industry through regulatory guidance and enforcement. Other regulators – including tax authorities – are doing the same.

The IRS, in conjunction with the Department of Justice, is preparing to launch enforcement actions against cryptocurrency-related tax crimes. Earlier this year, the agency said that it will begin to audit taxpayers with crypto assets in both its Small Business/Self-Employed Division and Large Business and International Division. The agency also plans to issue guidance on cryptocurrency to clarify the tax treatment of crypto assets.

Over the next three years, the IRS is expected to increase crypto-related enforcement actions and audit activities to ensure compliance with U.S. tax law. This is partly due to the agency’s concerns that the tax base could be eroded due to increases in cryptocurrency activities. To help prevent tax evasion, the IRS is pursuing enforcement actions for failure to report gains, failure to disclose foreign accounts, and failure to report Initial Currency Offerings (ICO) income.

Failure to report gains

The IRS plans to audit taxpayers who fail to report capital gains incurred through the sale or conversion of cryptocurrency, use of cryptocurrency to purchase goods and services, or receipt of free cryptocurrency through a “fork” or “airdrop.”

Additionally, amounts realized from the sale or exchange of property are subject to tax reporting in the U.S.—a rule crypto traders often ignore. Traders cite the Section 1031 provision, which states that no gain or loss is recognized if property held for investment, or in trade or business, is exchanged entirely for property of like kind. However, as of Jan. 1, 2018, Section 1031 applies only to real estate exchanges and a qualified intermediary is often required to complete exchanges.

Failure to disclose foreign accounts

In 2014, when the IRS said that cryptocurrency was to be considered property for tax purposes, it caused confusion among owners of digital assets as to whether they would be subject to FATCA compliance. It’s likely that ownership of cryptocurrency will be subject to FATCA, since cryptocurrency held in an online wallet is akin to funds held in an online poker account, which also are subject to disclosure requirements. In addition, some taxpayers could be required to file Form 8938 to disclose overseas financial assets.

Failure to report ICO income

Under normal circumstances, the proceeds of a security offering of equity or debt are nontaxable to the offeror. As a result, many ICOs in 2017 and 2018 neither treated the issuance as a realization event nor recognized income from the offering. However, since U.S. securities laws have no impact on tax classification or any other IRS policy, it’s likely that many ICO issuers failed to report income from those offerings, which could lead to enforcement action.

As the rules in this area are set to change within the near future, and enforcement activity could increase, investors holding crypto assets should monitor any changes closely with the help of a qualified tax professional.

Jack Brister s p 500
Jack is a noted expert in his field and has been widely published, in addition to speaking at numerous international engagements, Jack has also been named a Citywealth Top 100 US Wealth Advisor. Jack has more than 25 years of experience.  He specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures.
Israeli Court Ruling Opens Door for Real Estate Transfers Into Trusts

Israeli Court Ruling Opens Door for Real Estate Transfers Into Trusts

Israeli Court Ruling Opens Door for Real Estate Transfers Into Trusts

Jack Brister s p 500

Jack Brister

Founder, International Wealth Tax Advisors

Jack Brister, Founder of International Wealth Tax Advisors, is a noted international tax expert, with over 25 years of experience. Jack specializes in U.S. tax planning and compliance for non-U.S. families with international wealth and asset protection structures. Jack is a frequent featured speaker at numerous international financial conferences and has been named a Citywealth Top 100 U.S. Wealth Advisor.

Contact IWTA

To schedule an introductory phone conference with IWTA  founder Jack Brister simply click here. Email IWTA at bloginquiries@iwtas.com Or call the IWTA New York City office at 212-256-1142

A July 24 ruling from an Israeli court concerning the tax consequences for transferring real estate assets into trusts could ease the burden on taxpayers, including those with overseas assets or who are beneficiaries of foreign trusts. ‍ The decision could exempt the transfer of real estate into trusts from accruing capital gains taxes. The ruling from the Tel Aviv District Court spares individuals who create trusts in Israel, as well as any Israeli beneficiaries of trusts created by relatives abroad from such taxes. ‍ The verdict contradicts a long-standing policy from the Israel Tax Authority that says the transfer of real estate into trusts is a taxable event. In its decision, the court noted that the country’s existing trust law does not specifically refer to the treatment of real estate and admonished the authority for filling that regulatory gap with taxes. In effect, the court held, the agency essentially created the legislation for those taxes without proper authority. ‍ The ruling, which was in response to an appeal of a Tax Authority decision by a Canadian couple who disputed a capital gains tax assessment on the transfer of two Israeli properties into a trust, sets a precedent that has the potential to alter trust formation and how domestic and overseas assets are included. ‍ The Tax Authority argued that even though the transfer of assets into a trust isn’t normally taxable, Israel’s separate law on real estate taxation should take precedence over trust law. According to the Tax Authority, the transfer should be considered a taxable event upon which capital gains tax was due. The court disagreed with that argument and cited Section 75 of the Israel Tax Ordinance, which governs trusts but does not specifically mention real estate. Section 75 includes a special provision that determines the granting of an asset to a trustee does not constitute a sale and, according to the court’s ruling, “overrides the general provision in the Real Estate Law.” The court also said in its ruling that this means the granting of a real estate asset will not be considered a “sale” for purposes of the Real Estate Law. ‍ The decision could have a significant impact on the way tax professionals offer advice to clients with assets in Israel. Since the country doesn’t have an inheritance tax, trusts are not as common in Israel as they are in other nations. However, the recent expiration of a 10-year tax and reporting exemption for new immigrants, as well as a growing number of citizens becoming beneficiaries of trusts created by foreign family members, could see them begin to rise in popularity. The decision is being lauded by some experts, but it isn’t binding quite yet, as the Tax Authority is expected to appeal the decision, which will then bring the case before Israel’s supreme court. ‍ Does the outcome of this ruling have an impact on your financial picture? Talk to a qualified tax professional today to find out if these potential changes could have a bearing on your current or future plans.